More about Parliament Watch

Below, we compiled information on the history of Parliament Watch (in German: Abgeordnetenwatch), its finances and how you can launch Parliament Watch in your home country.

Parliament Watch leads to transparency and more accountability in politics

General Information

On (which translates as “member of parliament watch”) users find short profiles of their representatives in the federal and European parliaments and can publicly ask questions which are then answered by the elected officials.

Parliament Watch enables citizens to:

  • question their members of parliament and candidates in a public environment
  • find out about the voting record of their members of parliament
  • follow up on promises made (all questions and answers are saved forever)
  • learn about the extra earnings of members of parliament

All of these functions are completely free of charge and don't require prior registration.
Parliament Watch is financed through membership and one-off donations as well as premium profiles for candidates during election times.

The idea of Parliamentary Watch works: In average counts 6,800 visitors a day and about three million page impressions per month. More than 90% of all "Abgeordnete" (German for: members of parliament) of the federal parliament answer questions through In Germany, the project covers the federal parliament, the European parliament, twelve state parliaments and 54 communal parliaments.The corpus of our saved submissions is called the Digital Voters’ Memory and counts 178,825 questions and 143,556 answers as of August 2015.

So far we helped to start Parliament Watch projects in France, Ireland, Austria, Luxemburg, Greece and Tunisia. In addition, Parliament Watch inspires similar projects in other countries e.g. Malaysia.

We ask project partners to be impartial, independent and serious about their involvement. To ensure impartiality, we will not cooperate with political parties or high profile party members or politicians.

Find more information on the Parliament Watch Network.

New form of communication

Are we witnessing a revolution? It sure looks like it. The internet has changed the world and even the very nature of democracy. What was unthinkable in the past becomes a reality with Parliamentwatch: Citizens are enabled to engage in direct communication with their representatives and candidates. You can ask questions, discuss current topics and present own ideas and solutions. It is quite straightforward and marks nothing less than a revolutionary step from representative democracy to direct democracy.

Why is Parliament Watch so important?

Still today, most democracies in the world have only a few elements of direct participation (if any) and the decision-making process can be opaque.

The german federal parliament (Bundestag), for example, is the most important legislative branch in Germany and has more than 600 members. Half of them are directly elected from 299 constituencies, the other half is elected from the parties’ electoral lists to achieve proportional representation in the Bundestag.

On top of that the legislative bodies of the states (Länder) have each between 50 and 200 members. And finally there's the EU with numerous different institutions and growing impact on legislation in nation member states. No wonder citizens feel alienated from politics.

This is where Parliament Watch comes in. We are driven by the vision of a more accessible political elite and a more participatory population.




How does it work?

It is as easy as it can be. With voters, citizens, basically anybody can get in touch with their representatives. It's quite straightforward: All you have to do is give your name and e-mail address. You log on, give your zip code and your voting precinct is immediately found by the computer. You get the profile of your representative and you can fire away your question. All questions and answers are reviewed by a team of moderators to make sure the code of conduct is followed.

The code of conduct

In particular, questions that meet the following criteria are excluded:

  • Questions which are racist, sexist or inflammatory, or which disrespect or deride the victims of totalitarianism, discrimination or persecution
  • Questions worded in an insulting, abusive or dehumanising manner
  • Questions which intrude into someone's private life
  • Questions covered by professional confidentiality
  • Contributions which do not constitute a question or a request for a position, but merely express an opinion
  • Several supplementary questions (generally more than one, although we reserve the right to use discretion on this)
  • Questions from persons working for a candidate, party office or political group, and questions posed by the addressee

code of conduct in English

Statistics on

Almost seven thousand questions reach each month, 300.000 people enter the site and generate three million page impressions. In the beginning, elected officials and candidates were sceptical to the new approach, but they quickly saw the advantage of digital communication and now most questions are answered  - in fact over 90% of all listed politicians are active on Over 80% of all 34,200 questions in the last legislative period of the Bundestag (2009 -2013) were answered.

Petition check - our newest feature

Starting in 2015, we set up a new feature on Parliament Watch which is called  the “petition check“.
For this tool we feature a list of petitions revolving around popular topics that are not officially subject to the political debate yet. The idea is to submit the petition to all members of a parliament and ask them about their opinion on  the  topic. In order for this to happen an online petition has to meet certain requirements:
-    The parliament has to have decision-making power for the topic of the petition
-    The petition has to be signed by at least 100,000 people
-    A representative survey has to ensure that a majority of citizens is in favor of the request. 

The first step (of our petition platform) is to collect the required amount of signatures needed. As soon as the number is reached, we run a representative survey to learn about the general public opinion. If a majority of the public is in favor of the petition, we go on to the last step. All members of the parliament will be given the chance for a statement which is published in their profile on Parliament Watch. This way citizens can see what members of the parliament think about relevant social topics, which are otherwise not voted on in parliament.

How is Parliament Watch financed?

The goal of Parliament Watch is to create a more transparent democratic process and encourage citizens’ participation.

These aims can only be reached, when the platform itself stays completely independent. is financed by donations of its users and sponsors who donate a minimum of € 5 per month. So far there are more than 2,500 regulars.

In addition, politicians have the possibility to upgrade their profiles to include certain features. In return for a once-off payment of up to € 200 candidates can add a picture, CV, political goals and an election campaign calendar to their profile.

These additional features are optional. Basic details such as name, party, constituency, professional qualification and current occupation, as well as the interaction with voters, are completely free of charge.

How did this all get started?

In 2004 two friends, sociologist Gregor Hackmack (l.) and IT expert Boris Hekele (r.), would sit in a crowded pub in the city of Hamburg. At the time, a referendum on a new election system was held in the city and one particular question reoccured time and again: "How can I vote for a certain person when I don't even know who he or she is?” Gregor and Boris were having a beer when the idea for materialized in their heads. Now if that German beer known for its purity wasn't a good catalyst for democratic change.

Related links / material

Parliament Watch - Making Politics More Transparent and Accountable. Gregor Hackmack at "Ignite-Talk" in Phoenix, Arizona
From political apathy to engagement - blog entry and interview on ParliamentWatch
Annual Report 2014
Case Study on Parliament Watch -pdf, Dec. 2010
Handout (pdf)
The Irish Times
The code of conduct
Deutsche Welle: Politiker in Malaysia unter der Lupe (german)